Who’s got the emotional intelligence to be president?

Oct 08, 2008
bubble 5 comments
Submitted by: Ginny Deerin

At WINGS, we’re constantly monitoring how students are progressing on the factors that make up emotional intelligence. Lately, I’ve found myself measuring up a much different demographic…our country’s leaders.

The subject’s coming up more often in mainstream media, too. In analyzing the performance of vice presidential candidates in last week’s debate, for instance, Katrina vanden Heuvel of The Nation told George Stephanopolus that “Joe Biden was forceful, disciplined, gracious and showed he had a higher emotional IQ.”

As I watched the program, it struck me that as we choose a new president, we should all be considering how the candidates’ EQ – emotional quotient – stack up. For leaders, a high EQ is in some ways even more important than an analytical IQ because the ability to monitor personal emotions makes for more thoughtful decisions and actions.

But it can be tough to decipher. Being socially and emotionally intelligent amounts to much more than whether you’d enjoy sharing a beer with one candidate or feel inspired by the speeches of another. I like to use the last presidential elections as an example: In 2004, a majority of voters rated Bush as the most likable guy, but four years later polls show nearly 70 percent of the country thinks something is missing in his EQ or IQ. 

We’ve created a tool to make it easy for you to rate the candidates. Check it out here, and see how I’ve rated them myself below.

How do you think the candidates stack up? Here’s how I ranked them according to my assessment of their EQ:

 
Self Awareness
Self Management
Relationship Skills
Responsible Decision Making
Social Awareness
Totals
McCain
5
3
8
4
3
23
Obama
8
8
7
8
8
39
Palin
not sure
not sure
9
not sure
6
Not enough information
Biden
5
4
6
5
7
27

It’s best to have a cross-section of the five skills that make up social and emotional intelligence: self-awareness, self-management, relationship skills, responsible decision-making and social awareness.

Keeping the five components in mind, the congenial give-and-take of John McCain’s town hall meetings clearly shows he’s got strong relationship skills. But he falls short in responsible decision-making. In his autobiography, “Worth the Fighting For,” he says that “often my haste is a mistake, but I live with the consequences without complaint.”

The soaring rhetoric of Barack Obama’s speeches has inspired stadiums full of people, showing he can tap into the dreams and hopes of the electorate using his social awareness skills. But he’s been criticized for sometimes seeming less warm and spontaneous than voters would like, indicating weaknesses in some relationship skills.

The choice of Sarah Palin energized Republicans across the country, and triggered an outpouring of excitement. She demonstrates powerful social awareness and relationship skills. The way she expresses herself creates strong interpersonal connections, and people believe she would empathize with their problems.  

I scored Joe Biden high on relationship skills because he expresses himself with empathy and authenticity in way that helps voters relate to him. Politicians on both sides of the aisle testify to his ability to forge alliances that enlist the cooperation of others. But his habit of speaking without thinking, which has necessitated frequent apologies over the years, shows that he has deficits in self-management. His recent comment that Hillary Clinton “might have been a better pick than me” for the Democratic vice presidential spot is an example.

It should be interesting

I am interested to see the results of tomorrow's election and how the country will display their social and emotional intelligence. I have a feeling no matter what the outcome, a good number of people will be dissapointed. I always find it interesting to see how people react in times of disappointment, I think their true colors shine through! I hope no one reacts harshly or without fully thinking through the consequneces of their actions. This week at WINGS we are discussing managing our emotions by thinking first, feeling second, and then reacting, I hope the American people will do the same! Nicole Lovecchio Program Director WINGS @ Chicora Elementary

It's hard to judge

I am very openly, not a political person. I know our government is extremely important, I just take it for what it is and I haven't ever been the type to get involved politically. In this election year, I have been more aware of the election and the candidates than in the past. In reading this article, I do agree that our President needs a high EQ to lead the country. However, I think what you see on debates or in the media is only a small view into the candidates EQ. These are both very smart men. They know what they need to do and say to have the country believe them. Unfortunately, politicians have a history of being dishonest or just saying what they think the people want to hear. I think all politicans must have higher relationship skills, social awareness, and decision making skills to have gotten elected in the first place. At WINGS, we rate the EQ of our kids based on very intense relationships formed over at least a year. I think to truly understand a person's EQ, a deep personal relationship is necessary. These candidates have much more to them than what we see in the media and hopefully the candidate with the highest EQ, both in the media and personal life will win! Nicole Lovecchio Program Director WINGS @ Chicora Elementary

Importance of EQ in our Leaders

From what I have observed, many presidential candidates, as well as other leaders, have many policies that they plan to implement if given the chance to serve a term in office. Last night, I watched some of the final McCain/Obama debate. The debate included discussion about both candidates having to inevitably alter many of their policies. Prosposed policies seem to be hypotheses that may have to be trimmed to fit overall logistics. With this thought in mind, it is important that the people served connect with the candidate. Besides, after all of the layers of policies are peeled back, what is left? The people must believe that the candidate is able to address the important issues and have the social awareness to relate to all people, regardless of demographics. This is where the importance of EQ comes in. In My opinion, people will relate better with someone who demonstrates exceptional social skills.

Emotions determine outcomes

Emotions definitely determine how one handles situations. That's why I think that the media should not only focus on the presidential candidates' intelligence and characteristics, but they should also focus on their EQ. Right now, our economy is in trouble. The way a leader handles this issue is very important. Are they going to handle it by making a quick, rash decision that could be based on impulse? Or, are they going to sit down for a moment, collect and manage their feelings, and then decide how the issue's going to be handled? I wish there was enough information to determine Palin's EQ score, because I'm interested to see if she would've scored higher than the men, since women are supposed to have and be able to express their emotions more than men (so they say).

As a young person voting...

I appreciate the solid examples that you have given - they make sense to me! As a young person who is voting in my 3rd election, I feel that this is the most important time to really weigh the characteristics, intelligences, traits, personas, and abilities of the candidates and make a thoughtful decision. I find myself really looking at the whole picture of each presidential person in the hopes that I will make the most informed, educated vote yet. What I know for certain is that I can't make the smartest decision without thinking of the new smarts that is social and emotional intelligence. To me - you're smarter if you have those skills.